- “There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present Family Court System” – Judge Brian Lindsay Retired Supreme Court Judge
WHAT REALLY GOES ON IN UK SECRET FAMILY COURTS
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
Categories
- Adoption
- Care Proceedings
- Care Proceedings
- Child Welfare
- Children Council
- District Judge Karen Venables
- Family
- Family Law
- Foster Care
- Geldof on Fathers
- Health
- His Honour Judge Waine
- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
- Increase Transparency in the Family Courts
- Information
- Justice Lord Ward
- Law
- Legal
- Local Authorities
- Men
- News
- Northamptonshire
- Parental Rights
- President
- President of the Family Division
- Private Law
- Public Law
- Right Honourable Lord Justice Munby
- Secret family courts
- Sir Nicholas Wall
- Social Work
- Story
- Uncategorized
- Whistle-blower
Meta
Top Rated
Love this quote! Thanks for sharing.
Anyone who has gone through a bitter custody battle understands the truth of this statement. The family court system is set up to create animosity between people. They thrive on litigation and get paid by our government to promote it. It is a travesty and needs to be changed.
“It’s about activism and learning how to engage the political infrastructure.
Learn to protect your rights before others learn how to erode them.”
Lord Justice Wall commented: – “What social workers do not appear to understand is that the public perception of their role in care proceedings is not a happy one. They are perceived by many as the arrogant and enthusiastic removers of children from their parents into an unsatisfactory care system, and as trampling on the… rights of parents and children in the process.”
Family Law Week: Re X, Y and Z (Children) [2010] EWHC
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed60484
British Data: – “On November 20, 2008 the British Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted) issued an annual report signed by her majesty’s chief inpector Christine Gilbert. It shows on page 73 that 59,500 children are “cared for” by local authorities and on page 69 that 282 children died in the period 1 April 2007 to 31 August 2008.”
AUSTRALIA -
“It is a myth that Australia does not have federal human rights laws. King John’s Magna Carta of 1215 and the UK Bill of Rights of 1688 and the great common law are part of our ‘unwritten’ constitutional rights and freedoms inherited as part of our Anglo-British birthrights. But what good are they if our lawyers and our lawyers institutions turn a blind eye to them, and even seem to enjoy not just profit as a class by exploiting them ? How much more safely could Australians sleep at night with the comfort of modern, written Constitution and Bill of Rights, and, virtually important, political institutions and a manifest will of the people to ensure that the lawyers and the law courts do actually enforce them and not just give the idle lip-service.”
“once married to an individual who told her openly that he was an untouchable high level Freemason. After a major disagreement and subsequent divorce her children were illegally taken after a visit to hospital for one of her children who was knocked over by a motor cycle in suspicious circumstances. The nurse involved wrote a report saying that Maureen was unstable and an unfit mother. The children were immediately taken in to care and very soon after adopted. Maureen has had independent reports stating that she is perfectly fit.”
Pingback: Self Interests vs Public Service | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Disclaimer | Parents Rights Blog
ON APPEAL FROM NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT
(HIS HONOUR JUDGE WAINE)
Royal Courts of Justice
HHJ Waine did not have that, or other recent authorities in mind, probably for the simple reason that they were not cited, for the equally simple reason that the advocates had not come to court anticipating a trial. For all those reasons, I consider that the judge was wrong on that narrow point. I would, accordingly, allow the appeal and direct Diane Clark to meet again with the child to enable her to complete her enquiries, and to report more fully to the court. http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed1814
Agree, speaking as a Dad you get ground into their system. Here in the U.S. if you don’t live in a bible belt state you’re toast, regardless of what the ex spouse has said and done.
Pingback: UK Secret Courts | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Increase Transparency in the Family Courts | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Our Children | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Supreme Court Weighs Parental Rights Abuses by Social Workers, Police | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Foster Care | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Obese Children Should Be Separated From Parents | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The UK Establishment | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Ex-judge Ciavarella gets 28 years in children for cash case | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Family justice: who are protecting our children? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Family Mediation Explained | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Stop The United Kingdom From Selling Our Children | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Innocence Destroyed | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Eugenics | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Sir Nicholas Wall President Family Division and the Secrecy Rules | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Anonymity Of The Expert Witnesses | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The Judiciary of England of Wales | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Sir Nicholas Wall President of the Family Division | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Council leader admits staff harmed children in their care | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Parents Rights UK Establishment | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Whistle-blower claims to go forward in Gallup suit | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Domestic violence and a law of unintended consequences | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Children’s rights | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Human Trafficking | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Domestic Violence News & Information | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Vulnerable child repeatedly raped by social worker while in Northamptonshire children’s home | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Victim Information and Notification Everyday | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Access to legal services | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Judges, Magistrates and Tribunal Judges | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Australian Constitution and Common Law Being Trampled On | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Charles McNally | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Voices Silenced By Fear | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Removed by people who have no respect for their identity or their Cultural background | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Goldie: Born to shine | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The Family Court System | Expose Corrupt Courts | Scoop.it
Pingback: Jury Find In Favour of Gallup | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Due Process Of Law | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Miss N’s Complaint About The Children And Family Court Advisory And Support Service | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The Family Court System | Public Law Children Act Cases | Scoop.it