Thats our Judge
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
Categories
- Adoption
- Care Proceedings
- Care Proceedings
- Child Welfare
- Children Council
- District Judge Karen Venables
- Family
- Family Law
- Foster Care
- Geldof on Fathers
- Health
- His Honour Judge Waine
- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
- Increase Transparency in the Family Courts
- Information
- Justice Lord Ward
- Law
- Legal
- Local Authorities
- Men
- News
- Northamptonshire
- Parental Rights
- President
- President of the Family Division
- Private Law
- Public Law
- Right Honourable Lord Justice Munby
- Secret family courts
- Sir Nicholas Wall
- Social Work
- Story
- Uncategorized
- Whistle-blower
Meta
Top Rated
The issue is about the Family Court System and children who love their parents and their parents love them in return. We do understand that there are cases, where there is no choice but the Family Court needs to intervene, namely the Baby P case and other cases that are similar nature.
A clear review of Judges who preside over family matters is needed not for the future, action now. From the President’s previous comments and others before him We all need to be asking the President of the Family Division in THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE, what action will be taken toward change. Public is law is failing and the amendments to it are based in the best interest of the Judge who maybe presiding over a particular case.
A grandparent bought a judge and my son in 2008. The judge was subsequently voted out of office in 2010 due to his disregard of parental and children’s rights. However, the parents and children he has unconstitutionally separated have yet to be united.
“Hold the judges accountable for their crimes. JUDGES ARE NOT THE COURT.” – David Carlin
By Tim Taylor, March 18 2003
Extract
The House of Lords in the early 1980s had a clean sweep of Oxford men and all from leading public schools, with the exception being Lord Edmund Davis, a former grammar school boy. A decade earlier eight of nine judges in the Chancery Division had attended public school and Oxbridge. The educational backgrounds of the judges of the House of Lords, the Court of Appeal (Civil Division), the Chancery Division and the Commercial Court.
The judges in these courts, all are white, 98 per cent are male, 84 per cent went to public school and 90 per cent to Oxbridge; 78 per cent achieved what we called the “full house”, that is they are white, male, public school and Oxbridge.
In today’s House of Lords, out of 25 law lords, three were educated in South Africa and the same number were educated in British grammar schools. The only noticeable changes in diversity are that the judiciary has been enriched by there being more Jewish judges and more judges of South African extraction.
The above extract is dated, but relevant to our modern times.
COURT OF APPEAL http://towardchange.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/court-of-appeal/#more-648
Pingback: Obese Children Should Be Separated From Parents | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The UK Establishment | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Ex-judge Ciavarella gets 28 years in children for cash case | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Family justice: who are protecting our children? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Family Mediation Explained | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Stop The United Kingdom From Selling Our Children | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Innocence Destroyed | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Eugenics | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Sir Nicholas Wall President Family Division and the Secrecy Rules | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Anonymity Of The Expert Witnesses | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The Judiciary of England of Wales | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Sir Nicholas Wall President of the Family Division | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Council leader admits staff harmed children in their care | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Parents Rights UK Establishment | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Whistle-blower claims to go forward in Gallup suit | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Domestic violence and a law of unintended consequences | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Children’s rights | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Human Trafficking | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Domestic Violence News & Information | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Vulnerable child repeatedly raped by social worker while in Northamptonshire children’s home | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Victim Information and Notification Everyday | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Access to legal services | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Judges, Magistrates and Tribunal Judges | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Australian Constitution and Common Law Being Trampled On | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Charles McNally | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Voices Silenced By Fear | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Removed by people who have no respect for their identity or their Cultural background | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Goldie: Born to shine | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Jury Find In Favour of Gallup | Parents Rights Blog