Todd’s inability to foster a positive relationship with Miller and to support the children’s contact with him. These include her conclusions that Todd caused Laurel to believe that she has been sexually abused by her father, that it is likely that Todd influenced her children with her negative beliefs and did not protect the children from her feelings, that Todd’s parents have “wholly and adamantly” accepted that Miller is a pervasive negative influence on the children, and that Todd’s mother is active in helping her daughter prove that Miller sexually abused the children.
Pingback: Justice for Father and Child | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Parents Have Rights | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Crystal L. Cox, Whistleblower Media | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Funding threat over child law compliance – Irish Times | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Should Judges who preside over care proceedings have a mandatory psychology assessment? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Conflicts of Interest | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: THOUGHT FOR THE DAY | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Increase Transparency in the Family Courts | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: House of Lords | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: ADOPTION | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Judicial Accountability and Stare Decisis – Should the US be Learning from the UK? | Parents Rights Blog