McKenzie Friend
The term ‘McKenzie Friend‘ has been adopted in family law to describe an individual who provides assistance to a litigant in person (somebody not represented by either a solicitor or barrister).
Origin (Wikipedia)
McKenzie v. McKenzie was a divorce case in England. Levine McKenzie, who was petitioning for divorce, had been legally aided but the legal aid had been withdrawn prior to the case going to court. Unable to fund legal representation, McKenzie had broken off contact from his solicitors, Geoffrey Gordon & Co. However, one day before the hearing, Geoffrey Gordon & Co. sent the case to an Australian barrister in London, Ian Hanger, whose qualifications in law in Australia did not allow him to practise as a barrister in London. Hanger hoped to sit with his client to prompt him, take notes, and suggest questions in cross-examination, thereby providing what quiet assistance he could from the bar table to a man representing himself. The trial judge ordered Hanger that he must not take any active part in the case except to advise McKenzie during adjournments and must sit in the public gallery of the court. Hanger assumed his limited role was futile, and did not return for the second day of the trial.
The case went against McKenzie, who then appealed to the Court of Appeal on the basis that he had been denied representation. On 12 June 1970, the Court of Appeal ruled that the Judge’s intervention had deprived McKenzie of assistance to which he was entitled, and ordered a retrial.
In London’s Civil Appeal Court, top Judge, Lord Justice Ward said:
“The father complains bitterly, passionately, and with every justification, that the law is sterile, impotent and utterly useless.”



Pingback: Divorced Fathers Will Not Get Legal Right To Access | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: How the State Steals Children from Loving Parents | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Parents Rights Blog | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: We believe that the Children Act has unintentionally handed enormous power to local authorities and experts | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Family Proceedings Court | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: This Care System Is Creating Written-Off Children | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Supreme Court Weighs Parental Rights Abuses by Social Workers, Police | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Law Commission And Misconduct in Public Office | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: International Child Sex Cartel By A Former U.S. Senator | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Corruption in Our Courts: What It Looks Like and Where It Is Hidden | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: What Really Goes On In A Family Court? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Tyranny And The UK Establishment | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: McKenzie Friend | Public Law Children Act Cases | Scoop.it
Pingback: McKenzie Friend | Northamptonshire County Council (UK) | Scoop.it
Pingback: McKenzie Friend | Eugenics | Scoop.it
Pingback: McKenzie Friend | Expose Corrupt Courts | Scoop.it
Pingback: McKenzie Friend | Family-Centred Care Practice | Scoop.it
Your site is extremely consise and informative. Keep up the great work and “kudos” to all those involved
Yes My*Angel, “kudos” to all those involved; including you. Lovely, to read from you!