Judges Outraged at Breach of Family Court Secrecy
“The secrecy imposed by British family courts has a lot more to do with protecting judges than with protecting children. And I’d say this case bears that out. What they’re really upset about is the women breaching the secrecy of family court proceedings.”
Where have we heard this before?
“Those unfortunates had looked into the claims and found them to be false, so Watson took to the ether to libel them by name as well as the Doncaster Council.” ~ Sir Nicholas Wall
Social services are allowed to routinely groom and coach children. Commonly known as achieving best evidence amongst bad social workers, the Royal Court of Justice does nothing about this by placing happy and well adjusted children in care.
The new approach to hiding false allegations and how particular Judges attempt to bury the business of using children for profit is to label the parent/s mentally ill without any supporting evidence. A quack diagnosis by an independent psychiatrist is not evidence and a judge is not a psychiatrist either. The people who submit the evidence have no interest in the child in question. Being paid over £3,000.00 for a fifteen minute assessment ….
The psychology departments already make a shed load of money from local authorities for fabricating stories about parents. The Government is proposing to take paedophiles off the sex offenders list, because it infringes on their human rights and clearing them to work with children, which is absolute ne.
Doncaster Council to be stripped of control of children’s services
Doncaster Council is to become the first local authority to be stripped of control of children’s services, following a “legacy of failure”.
The education secretary Michael Gove said an independent trust would run services, which have been supervised by government since 2009, from next year.
Do any of us really want that from sour creator, to be held accountable. But everyone who had knowledge of the abuse and those who failed to help.”
Jurisdiction to stay an ACTION
UNITED KINGDOM – “The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an ACTION which MUST FAIL; as for instance, an action brought in respect of an act of State.”