Agony Of Mother Whose Baby Girl Was Put Up For Adoption In The Sponsored Secret Family Courts
“Agony of mother whose baby girl was put up for #adoption after secret court judge forced her to have a caesarean.”
From Kevin Bull
UK State Snatch Baby Directly from visiting Italian Citizens Womb?
THINK before risking your children on a holiday or a visit to the UK!
What a shame the poor Italian mother was poorly legally advised to accept the jurisdiction of the Court of England, losing her baby to the UK Child Stealing State, instead of applying through International Law for her baby to be returned to Italy.
Sadly oh so often it is too late to recover from legal blunders like this.
Litigating the lawyers concerned is clearly very necessary in this case!
A complete lack of empathy, caring & protection of both mother and child by the UK Child Stealing State, which is now clearly an aggressor/predator to it’s own citizens and the rest of the world!
Christopher, Brendan, John, make sure this case is not buried like many others by too little MSM follow through, leaving the general public the opinion that it was so shocking, not hearing much further indicates it must therefore have been resolved. Well revealed!
Sadly, had the mother (being habitually resident in Italy and only being a visitor to the UK) been advised by her UK legal team not to accept the jurisdiction of the Court of England under Domestic Law, but instead to file under International Law a BIIR case with Italy being the requesting State, against the UK being the requested State, for the return of her baby to Italy under Article 15 of BIIR International Law, being “The Transfer of Proceedings” to Italy. The mother would have succeeded in protecting her baby from being kept by the UK State and forcibly adopted to other parents.
The Article 15 BIIR case for “The Transfer of Proceedings” to Italy being the habitual residence of the mother could have been made by first approach to either the Central Authority of the UK or Italy, followed by full Application before the Court of England under International Law, not accepting the jurisdiction of the Court of England under Domestic Law.
The lesson to be learned from this case is “When visiting a foreign jurisdiction (particularly one as corrupt and dangerous as the UK) never accept the jurisdiction of the countries courts you are visiting when you are habitually resident in your own country elsewhere, without taking full legal advise from an International Law legal team from your home country of habitual residence first, as you may have legal right to apply for transfer of Domestic Proceedings to your own country of habitual residence, instead of accepting the Jurisdiction of the Courts of the country you are visiting/holidaying in under that country’s Domestic Law.
No prizes here in realising that the legal advise & representation this poor lady received without her consent or choosing, or otherwise at the time of Appeal in the UK, was clearly against her interest and her baby’s, in leading her to accept the jurisdiction of the Court of England by going before the Court, originally and at the time of Appeal, instead of advising her to file an International Law BIIR Article 15 case for Transfer of Proceedings, returning her baby to Italy.
The Application then going before the Court of England with Italy being the requesting State and the UK the requested State in this International Law case.
The question also remains, in that if the media story is correct in indicating the mother may not have needed a caesarean section for medical reasons, then the only rationale left for this being done must be that Mum was recovering and likely to return to Italy with her baby still safe inside her womb?
In which case this would literally be a UK State child snatch directly from the womb!
Clearly with almost every UK State Local Authority Social Services Child Stealing case being corrupted for years now, without any improvements seen to stop this, then there is no intention by the UK State to stop this predatory corrupt disgusting action.
The only answer left when any State is corrupt towards it’s own citizens and others and refuses to mend it’s ways, is more direct action to hold those that are corrupt to account!
Here are 2 MSM media sources for the complete shocking story of how this lady was snatched during a panic attack, detained, court ordered surgical removal of her unborn baby and finally the forced adoption of her baby.
Animals have more rights than citizens and foreign nationals in the UK it seems!
The adoption hearing judgment made by Judge Roderick Newton in February at Chelmsford County Court in full:
1. THE JUDGE: The court is concerned with P. Her welfare is my paramount consideration. She has been subject to an interim care order, in fact from the date of her birth. Her mother is A. She is an Italian national. Her father is B who is a Senegalese national, he is currently living in Italy. His situation is unclear, as I understand it he travelled there under a student visa, at least on one version, and is an over-stayer. He certainly has no status in Italy and he is unable, as I understand it, as a result of his status, either to leave Italy at all, and is certainly not able to come to the United Kingdom. As long ago as 2nd November 2012 I gave him permission to intervene, that is to say to take an interest in these proceedings. I had not necessarily expected him to attend, because there was a information that he had lawyers in Italy, he has failed to take any part except for the fact that he saw both the social worker and the Guardian when they visited Italy, and has written to the court today indicating that he opposes the application of the Local Authority. Click here to continue reading →
Adoption today has become a business that sells children as commodities …
Essex County Council responds to interest in story headlined “Essex removes baby from mother”
The story has garnered a lot of attention and it now appears that Sir Munby, the President of the Family Division, has decided to take over the case and deal with it himself. Click here to continue reading →
However, Essex County Council are also taking matters into their own hands having been vilified by the national media and caused eyebrows like our own to rise at the seemingly rash and thoughtless actions which they appear to have undertaken in the best interests of the child in question.
Re AA  EWHC 4378 (COP)
The patient was represented by the Official Solicitor who instructed a Queen’s Counsel on her behalf. He did not seek an adjournment and did not oppose the application, agreeing that the proposed delivery by caesarean section was in the best interests of the patient herself who risked uterine rupture with a natural vaginal birth. I agreed that the medical evidence was clear and, applying binding authority from the Court of Appeal concerning cases of this nature, as well as the express terms of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, made the orders and declarations that were sought.
Although I emphasised that the Court of Protection had no jurisdiction over the unborn baby, I offered advice to the local authority (which were not a party to or represented in the proceedings, or present at the hearing) that it would be heavy-handed to invite the police to take the baby following the birth using powers under section 46 of the Children Act 1989. Instead, following the birth there should be an application for an interim care order at the hearing of which the incapacitated mother could be represented by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor. Click here to continue reading →
” Yet this goes on in court by the hundreds on a daily bases. It seems to me that they are trying to cover up and protect the preditors in the system once again. The words of The Great Charter are now no defence against the fist of the ‘law’.
GOD GAVE ME MY CHILDREN,, NOT THE STATE!
- Cash for kids in ‘kids for cash’
- Circuit Bench Retirement – Stephen Phillip Waine.
- Court Procedure
- Edinburgh social workers facing jail are ‘a wake-up call’.
- Ex-judge Ciavarella gets 28 years in children for cash case.
- Expert testimony leading to family breakups.
- Judges Outraged at Breach of Family Court Secrecy.