Re D (Withdrawal of Parental Responsibility) [2014] EWCA Civ 315


The mother had two daughters from a previous relationship before meeting the father of her youngest child, now 10 years old. The father was named on the birth certificate and he therefore had parental responsibility.

Source: www.familylaw.co.uk

See on Scoop.itParental Responsibility

Advertisements

About towardchange

Your ‘Family Rights’ believing in the best interest of children. The issues which are important to me are, children and their families, the injustices to parents, which may occur, because of inadequate information, mistakes or corruption. This is happening every day. every minute and every second. For years I have campaigned for the rights of children and their voices to be heard.
This entry was posted in Family Law. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Re D (Withdrawal of Parental Responsibility) [2014] EWCA Civ 315

  1. Pingback: Behind The Secret Walls Of The Family Court System | Parents Rights Blog

  2. Pingback: Debb Fisher – Sask Assoc of Social Workers hangs up the phone ! | Parents Rights Blog

  3. Pingback: Canadian family law – Ethical Issues That Arise From Social Media Use In Courtrooms | Parents Rights Blog

  4. Pingback: Social Worker’s Who Bragged On Facebook About Getting Children Put Into Care | Parents Rights Blog

  5. Pingback: Arrested Catholic Archbishop’s Computer contained Over 100,000 Images Of Children | Parents Rights Blog

  6. Pingback: Michael Ellis (British politician) | Parents Rights Blog

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s