In Propria Persona (Person)


Persons are also divided into citizens, (q.v.) and aliens, (q.v.)when viewed with regard totheir political rights. When they are considered in relation to their civilrights, they are living orcivilly dead; vide Civil Death; outlaws; and infamous persons.

Source: Word Of The Day: Person.

In ancient Rome, the word persona (Latin). Personhood is the status of being a person.

“A party to a lawsuit who represents himself (acting in propria persona) is appearing in the case “pro se.” adj. from Latin “for one’s self,” acting on one’s own behalf, generally used to identify a person who is acting as his/her own attorney in a lawsuit. The popular abbreviation is “in pro per.”  www.tabberone.com

fd982fd2-c115-4446-873f-e494ba1c1e90 The Magna Carta (originally known as the Charter of Liberties) of 1215, written in iron gall ink on parchment in medieval Latin, using standard abbreviations of the period. Generally, liberty is distinctly differentiated from freedom in that freedom is primarily, if not exclusively, the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; whereas liberty concerns the absence of arbitrary restraints and takes into account the rights of all involved. As such, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others.

Philosophy

The Magna Carta (originally known as the Charter of Liberties) of 1215.

In propria persona. adj. from Latin “for one’s self,” acting on one’s own behalf, generally used to identify a person who is acting as his/her own attorney in a lawsuit. The popular abbreviation is “in pro per.”

hqdefault

What is a natural person?

“In jurisprudence, a natural person is a human being, as opposed to a legal person, which may be a private (i.e., business entity or non-governmental organization) or public (i.e., government) organization. In many cases, fundamental human rights are implicitly granted only to natural persons.” 

 

Fundamental Rights

Human rights are commonly understood as “inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human beingHuman rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.

This is interesting

Governments definition of our PERSON

8th December2008

Keith made this Freedom of Information request to Attorney General’s Office.

Please supply information as to the governments legal meaning of the word PERSON as written in the statute books and how it relates the a human being. I have researched and there are many who state with some authority that a human being is NOT a person but HAS a person that is made a legal entity (a corporate sole) on registration of the birth of the child.

In a nutshell here is the reply:

I have looked into your request and have to inform you that your request
does not fall within the Freedom of Information Act as it is a request
for legal interpretation of the word Person, in which this office is
unable to assist.

Keith reaponds with a statement, any other reasonable person would make:

I would like to make it clear that I am NOT seeking legal advice, rather information that should be made public and is in the general publics interest to be aware of.

I would draw your attention to the maxim: Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
I would argue that for that maxim to be true then one would have to be in possession of ALL the facts. If the definition used in common language is different to the one used to enforce statute, then the public are at a distinct disadvantage…and may even be being purposely deceived. — surely not!

As you can see, the Interpretation Act 1978 c.30 includes these definitions for “PERSON”:
“Person” includes a body of persons corporate or unincorporate. [1889]
(5) The definition of “person”, so far as it includes bodies corporate, applies to any provision of an Act whenever passed relating to an offence punishable on indictment or on summary conviction.

Both definitions use the word “includes” but do not define “PERSON“.

Click hare to read the full text->

Remember, even when you feel that your back is up against the ropes and you want to throw the towel in, there’s still always one more fight left in you and there’s still always something left worth fighting for and holding onto.

Useful Links For People Who Present Themselves, In Propria Persona.

Do your own research

cd823b37-5330-455e-aae3-d84c442255ad

Advertisements

About towardchange

Your ‘Family Rights’ believing in the best interest of children. The issues which are important to me are, children and their families, the injustices to parents, which may occur, because of inadequate information, mistakes or corruption. This is happening every day. every minute and every second. For years I have campaigned for the rights of children and their voices to be heard.
This entry was posted in Education, Family Law, Law, Legal, Public Law and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: