Taking Up You Want To Argue That A Decision Was Incorrect And Going Nowhere? Your Solution Awaits..


Taking Up You Want To Argue That A Decision Was Incorrect And Going Nowhere? Your Solution Awaits..

You win some, you lose some.

The requirements of the Court of Appeal and they can be quite exacting.

When you want to argue that a decision was incorrect there are alternative remedies, such as #appealing against the decision to a higher court


Legal and procedures are never the same. Both are entirely two different standards. Procedure having NOTHING to do with law.

Why waste your time with court staff or other government officials in An Attempt to review a judgment made by the courts. 


a. A higher court’s review of the correctness of a decision by a lower court.

b. A case so reviewed.

c. A request for a higher court to review the decision of a lower court.

4. The power of attracting or of arousing interest:

About towardchange

Your ‘Family Rights’ believing in the best interest of children. The issues which are important to me are, children and their families, the injustices to parents, which may occur, because of inadequate information, mistakes or corruption. This is happening every day. every minute and every second.
This entry was posted in Care Proceedings, Family Law, Franklin cover-up, Information and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Taking Up You Want To Argue That A Decision Was Incorrect And Going Nowhere? Your Solution Awaits..

  1. towardchange says:

    Judicial review: court proceedings in which a judge is asked to review the lawfulness of the decision which is being challenged.

    A civil wrong or wrong is a cause of action under the law of the governing body. Tort, breach of contract and breach of trust are types of civil wrong. Something that amounts to a civil wrong is said to be wrongful. A wrong involves the violation of a right because wrong and right are complementary terms. A statement that an act complained of is legally wrongful as regards the party complaining implicitly includes a statement that the act complained of prejudicially affects the party complaining in some legal right.
    The law that relates to civil wrongs is part of the branch of the law that is called the civil law. A civil wrong is capable of being followed by what are called civil proceedings. It is a misnomer to describe a civil wrong as a “civil offence”. The law of England recognised the concept of a “wrong” before it recognised the distinction between civil wrongs and crimes (which distinction was developed during the thirteenth century).

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.