Dozens Of CPS Caseworkers Caught Lying, Falsifying Documents


Dozens Of CPS Caseworkers Caught Lying, Falsifying Documents When Child Protective Services received a complaint that a Harris County father had choked his teenage daughter, caseworker Michelle Robinson said she hurried to the house, conducted a thorough investigation, determined there … Continue reading

Gallery | Tagged , , , , | 24 Comments

How To Make Contact With The Solicitors Regulation Authority


 

How To Make Contact With The Solicitors Regulation Authority

via Misconduct in Public Office

Other ways to contact them

Contact centre

Our contact centre can help with most queries.

Phone

0370 606 2555 inside the UK (Call costs guide from Ofcom)

Opening hours
  • 08.00 to 18.00, Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday
  • 09.30 to 18.00, Tuesday
International callers

+44 (0)121 329 6800

If you are concerned about the service provided by your own solicitor or firm you must always try complaining to your solicitor or firm first. If you have and they have not resolved the complaint to your satisfaction within eight weeks, you can take your case to the Legal Ombudsman.

 

What you should know

 

The Legal Ombudsman deals with all aspects of poor service, such as:

 

  • delayed or unclear communication;
  • problems with your fees;
  • loss of documents;

 

They can:

 

  • order the lawyer or firm to apologise;
  • order the lawyer or firm to refund all or part of your fees;
  • order the lawyer or firm to return your documents;
  • pay compensation if you have lost out due to poor service;

 

The contact details are:

 

 

The Solicitors Regulation Authority

 

They deal with cases where firms or individuals we regulate have breached our Principles and allegations of dishonesty or discrimination. You can send us a report if you have concerns about the conduct of a law firm or an individual we regulate.

 

What you need to do

 

Complete their report form and send it to:
Solicitors Regulation Authority
The Cube
199 Wharfside Street
Birmingham
B1 1RN
or email report@sra.org.uk

 

Further information can be found on their website here.

 

Please note, they do not look into personal complaints about solicitors or firms. We cannot award compensation for poor service or reduce your legal fees. If the Legal Ombudsman finds issues that need the attention of the Solicitors Regulation Authority, they send this to them, and vice versa. This agreement is set out on their website here.

Related Articles →

Follow @NgoziGodwell

Posted in Family Law | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017


The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017

Video: Understanding Equality & Diversity – Equality Act 2010 [UK]

Citation, commencement and interpretation

1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017 and come into force on 6th April 2017.  Continue reading →

EQUALITY & DIVERSITY Equality is not about treating all people in the same way. It’s about recognising and respecting diversity enough to adapt practice.(slideplayer.com)

btn_donatecc_lg

Related Articles →

Follow @NgoziGodwell

Posted in Family Law | Leave a comment

Scotland Yard Apologises To Women Deceived Into Relationships With Undercover Officers


 

Scotland Yard Apologises To Women Deceived Into Relationships With Undercover Officers

PETER MACDIARMID/GETTY IMAGES

The judge chairing the public inquiry into undercover police who had sex with their activist targets has caused an outcry by saying that officers were less likely to enter illicit relationships if they were happily married.

Sir John Mitting’s “old-fashioned” views angered those who were duped into relationships, marriage and even having children with police officers who infiltrated the environmental and animal rights protest movements. His comments, and wider unease over his handling of the inquiry, are likely to lead to a boycott of proceedings by victims.

The inquiry has already cost more than £9 million but is not expected to hear any evidence until next year. It was ordered in 2014 by Theresa May as home secretary, but has been beset by delays.

Sir John, 70, said that his experience of life had shown that men who were in lengthy marriages were “less likely to have engaged in extramarital affairs”.

Victims told The Times that the remarks added to their concerns about the judge’s ability to carry out a proper investigation into police tactics that resulted in dozens of women being duped into relationships over three decades.

 

Sir John has been considering whether the cover names and real identities of officers should be released. Discussing an application in February, he indicated that he thought it was unlikely that the officer would have entered illicit relationships because he had a long marriage.

He said: “We have had examples of undercover male officers who have gone through more than one long-term permanent relationship, sometimes simultaneously. There are also officers who have reached a ripe old age who are still married to the same woman that they were married to as a very young man. The experience of life tells one that the latter person is less likely to have engaged in extramarital affairs than the former.”

The above is an abstract of an article from The Times Newspaper by 

The cases involved four officers who worked on an undercover unit called the Special Demonstration Squad, Bob Lambert, John Dines, Mark Jenner, and Jim Boyling, and another from the National Public Order Intelligence Unit, Mark Kennedy. They became involved in intimate sexual relationships with members of environmental campaign groups they were trying to infiltrate from the mid-1980s to 2010.

via Scotland Yard Apologises To Women Deceived Into Relationships With Undercover Officers

Related Articles →

btn_donatecc_lg

Follow @NgoziGodwell

Titanic -noota music موسيقة تايتنك by Classical Music  on SoundCloud

Posted in Family Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Police Have Powers Under Section 46 Of The Children Act 1989 To Protect Children.


 

The Police Have Powers Under Section 46 Of The Children Act 1989 To Protect Children.

btn_donatecc_lg

If the police believe a child is at risk of suffering significant harm in a situation then they can exercise powers to remove the child to suitable accommodation.

However the child cannot be kept in police protection for more than 72 hours.

The usual procedure would be for the child to then be turned over to the local authority to be placed into foster care.

It is at this point that a new name would be given so the child can start a new life in a new location with a family.

A court can make an order protecting the child’s identity.

FB_IMG_1525040007223

btn_donatecc_lg

Related Articles  →

Follow @NgoziGodwell

Posted in Family Law | Tagged | Leave a comment

Question It!


An official review into the care system in Scotland has concluded that children in care are being bullied because they are using social work jargon they are picking up from their case workers. The review calls on the government to use language that makes sense to children and doesn’t lead to them being singled out and bullied.

via Question It!

Posted in Family Law, Public Law, Social Work And The Shift From ‘Welfare’ To ‘Justice’ By Lieve Bradt | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

All You Need To Know About Subject Access Requests


 

All You Need To Know About Subject Access Requests

The £10 fee for subject access requests will be removed on 25th May 2018 in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

All requests received up until 11.59pm Thursday 24th May will be processed as per current legislation and a £10 fee will be applied.

All requests received from 12.00am on Friday 25th May onwards will be processed in line with the new legislation, free of charge.

The website will be updated to reflect these changes in due course. Continue reading →

Logan Paul – Help Me Help You Ft. Why Don’t We (GARABATTO Remix) by GARABATTO on #SoundCloud

via Billion Dollar Children – Justina Pelletier Repeat

Posted in Family Law | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Parents Get Kids Taken Because of Low IQ/Court OKs Barring High IQ for Cops


Parents Get Kids Taken Because of Low IQ/Court OKs Barring High IQ for Cops

via Parents Get Kids Taken Because of Low IQ/Court OKs Barring High IQ for Cops

Posted in Family Law | Tagged | Leave a comment

Video: Understanding The Legal Name


 

Video: Understanding The Legal Name

Please click here to watch →

BIRTH CERTIFICATE FRAUD; CLAUSULA REBUS SIC STANTIBUS 

by kate of kaea

ATTENTION: Lawyer, Judge, Government Agent/employee, Police, Common Man etc. et al/any/all who serve as a fictional LEGAL NAME/TITLE/I.D.-ENTITY (pronounced phonetically example: “leg-all enemy”((N-AM-E), “tit-El”/Luciferian)) character in the legal world reality;

Author’s note where the “author” is defined as anyone who uses these words as their’s where truth cannot be “copyrighted”, merely shared by agreement and these words are theirs, regardless of “who” wrote the words ab initio where truth belongs to all in CONCEPTUAL (heart and mind written, causal, not the physical “written” form, effectual.), where this writing/righting/riting is written (spelled out) in language understandable to both those in and out of the LEGAL NAME FRAUD profession/reality where the common understanding of this fraud and crime against humanity and creation is visible both in laymen’s and legal terms, not to be confused by the intent of the reader where the “author’s” (the intentions thereof/therein) intentions are crystal clear: i.e. legal word/world wranglers and twisters of “HEARINGS” where it is spelled out henceforth/herein with all potential(s) of phonics deception(s) hereby and therefore, removed, ad infinitum;

For example, a phonics deception is, where one thing is SPOKEN by a non-B.A.R. member (general public/any/all legal name users without B.A.R. affiliation(s)/permission(s)), only to be re-spelled differently by any/all B.A.R. members under assumption and presumption to corrupt the ORIGINAL INTENT of the one speaking versus spelling it out, and why a FRAUDULENT, by deliberate design, LEGAL NAME non-B.A.R. member has no voice in the legal dead reality: in other words, one’s words, spoken, cannot be altered from the speaker’s ORIGINAL TRUE INTENT as to what they mean versus what the one HEARING the spoken form of the words hears, and then, corrupts them, and their SPOKEN words, by using alternative spellings under assumption/presumption of the SAME SOUND homonyms, with completely different “definition(s)” using this spelling trickery to undo them and gain the HONOUR advantage where no honour in them exists and the non-BAR member is rendered in a state of perpetual DISHONOUR unknowingly: i.e. twists them, the non-BAR member speaking/ their spoken words SPOKEN, backwards/around/opposes/negates/corrupts the SPEAKER’S original intent, to initiate and perpetrate/instigate FRAUD against them to enable “imaginary crimes” to profit from STATUTORY COMMERCIAL RAPE/KIDNAPPING etc. et al, thus why court “pro-seedings” are called HEARINGS where SPELLINGS is a more precise term for what is really going on: Thus, this is spelling it out clearly where assumption and presumtion is rendered null and void where any/all use/claiming to be a LEGAL NAME ENTITY has everyone in the original sin/sign, state of fraud from the creation of, and continued use of the LEGAL NAME that appears on every birth certificate until they remove themselves from the criminal legal reality where anyone involved in the enforcement of this fraud using violence, trickery, coercion etc. et al to ensnare with intent to enslave another, is, in fact, aiding and abetting a criminal act by forcing another into submission to its use where this truth has been exposed and where it is illegal to use any/all legal name(s)/titles ab initio;…

Continue Reading →

btn_donatecc_lg

Posted in blog, Family Law, News, Private Law, Public Law, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment

Word Of The Day: You


 

Word Of The Day: You

 

oxford-dictionaries

via Be Your Own Authority.

pronoun, possessive your or yours, objective you, plural you.

1.

the pronoun of the second person singular or plural, used of the person or persons being addressed, in the nominative or objective case:

You are the highest bidder. It is you who are to blame. We can’t help you. This package came for you. Did she give you the book?
2.

one; anyone; people in general:

a tiny animal you can’t even see.
Posted in Family Law | Tagged | Leave a comment

EU Court: Child Refugees Can Apply To Bring Their Families


 

EU Court: Child Refugees Can Apply To Bring Their Families

via Child asylum seekers and a culture of disbeliefamilies.

btn_donatecc_lg

Children refugees, mostly from Syria and Afghanistan, who live at the Elaiona and Schistos reception facilities are guided on the ancient Acropolis Hill in Athens, Greece, 9 May 2016л [Alexandros Beltes/EPA]

Refugees who enter the European Union alone as minors can apply to be reunited with their families, even if they reach legal adulthood before the end of the process, the EU’s top court ruled today (12 April).

At the peak of Europe’s migrant crisis in 2015, 96,465 lone children applied for asylum in the EU, although numbers have fallen since then. The official term is “unaccompanied minors”.

 

 

Posted in Family Law | Tagged | Leave a comment