Legal Aid Protest Old Palace Yard Parliament Square
Criminal Lawyers Stage A Second Protest Today: England And Wales
April 25th is the Annual Parental Alienation Awareness Day!
Parental Alienation
Time and again the law allows them to get away with it whilst it is left to the good parents to pick up the pieces and salvage some kid of normality from an abnormal and erroneous law! Support the call by this excellent organisation and lets make this awareness worldwide TODAY!
via The police corruption map of England and Wales.
Friday, March 7, 2014 10:00am
10am legal aid protest old palace yard parliament square. A shameful day in legal history’: reaction to Transforming Legal Aid.The justice secretary Chris Grayling’s long-awaited response to his controversial Transforming Legal Aid consultation on criminal legal aid has been met with a unanimous cry of outrage from the profession.The reforms outlined in the response include the introduction of an immediate initial cut to solicitors’ fees of 8.75% from 20th March and another 8.75% cut in June 2015. The number of duty solicitor contracts will be cut from around 1600 to just 525. Barristers fees will be cut by an average of 6%, with a 2% reduction for the junior Bar in the Crown Court. Cuts to fees in Very High Costs Cases (VHCCs) remain at 30%.Announcing the reforms, Grayling said: ‘As everybody knows this government is dealing with an unprecedented financial challenge and I have no choice but to look for the savings I have to make across the full range of the Ministry of Justices’s work. I cannot exempt legal aid from this, but that doesn’t mean I don’t understand how challenging these reductions will be.’‘Legal aid is a vital part of our justice system but we must ensure it is sustainable for those who need it, for those who provide legal services as part of it and for the taxpayer, who ultimately pays for it.’ Chris Grayling Nicola Hill, president of the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association (LCCSA) declared yesterday ‘a shameful day in legal and criminal justice history.’ ‘Cutting legal aid fees so that experienced legal aid lawyers are driven out of business leaves clients at the mercy of low-paid, unqualified lawyers – unless of course they are rich enough to afford a private lawyer,’ said Hill.‘These newly confirmed cuts are a short-cut to a two-tier system, where justice becomes a luxury not a right. This can’t be right for any defendant, whose liberty, family and livelihood are often at stake.’ Nicola added that criminal defence lawyers are now ‘more resolved than ever to oppose the implementation of these cuts’.Urging her colleagues to join the march against the cuts on 7 March, Hill said: ‘Criminal defence lawyers can’t stand by and allow the rule of law and the principle of a fair and quality defence for anyone accused of a crime be wrecked in one final blow for justice.’
A disaster for the publicThe Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA) was equally vociferous in its reaction to the government’s reforms. ‘The impact of the MoJ proposals is a disaster for the public who will find it increasingly difficult to gain access to a local solicitor willing to provide legal aid in the face of a State funded investigation and prosecution,’ said a statement from the representative body. The CLSA went on further to say, the cuts announced by the government ‘fly in the face of the evidence provided by experts and seen by the Government which show that many firms are on a financial knife edge’ and accused the government of ‘failing to listen’ – conducting a sham consultation as a ‘tick box exercise’. ‘The result is the most serious assault upon the ability of the profession to defend the public against the power of the State,’ said the CLSA. Bar Chairman Nick Lavender QC said that the the Bar is ‘bitterly disappointed’ that the Government is pressing ahead with ‘financially unnecessary’ cuts to criminal legal aid. The criminal justice system ‘will be worse for these changes’, said Lavender, declaring them to be a false economy.
Nigel Lithman, chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), said the CBA’s initial response to the announcement was one of ‘profound disappointment’. ‘In spite of our considered responses both in meetings and in written submissions, the Minister has chosen fundamentally to ignore us,’ said Lithman. ‘It is simply expected that the Criminal Bar will accept cuts unparalleled in any other sector of the wider community.’ A shocking attack on us all Franklin Sinclair – the senior partner of one of the UK’s largest criminal firms, Tuckers solicitors – surprised the profession by declaring his support for action in protest against the cuts. ‘On behalf of Tuckers Solicitors I fully endorse the CLSA protocol for the Day of Action,’ said Sinclair. ‘I shall comply with that.’ Sinclair and his firm refused to take part in the profession’s first half-day of action on 6 January, slamming it as ‘a waste of time and possibly counter-productive’. But responding to yesterday’s announcement, he said: ‘The MoJ response is disgraceful and sadly chaos and carnage will surely follow.’ He continued: ‘The beleaguered and already long-suffering criminal defence suppliers will not be able to withstand an immediate 8.75% cut without at the very least a lowering of the high standards of service the Courts and Police and CPS have come to expect. I only hope that our clients do not suffer from this shocking attack on us all.’ |
Latest Lifestyle, Family and Child Protection News Right Now! |
---|
Pingback: #METPOLICE – Institutionally Corrupt | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The Law Society Of Scotland Will Press Ahead With Plans To Admit Non-Solicitors As Members | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: FEATURED: ‘ The Law Society Of Scotland Will Press Ahead With Plans To Admit Non-Solicitors As Members ‘ | ' True Scotsmans News '