“A child is any human being below the age of eighteen years, unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.”[4] According to Cornell University, a child is a person, not a subperson, and the parent has absolute interest and possession of the child, but this is very much an American view. The term “child” does not necessarily mean minor but can include adult children as well as adult nondependent children.[5] There are no definitions of other terms used to describe young people such as “adolescents“, “teenagers,” or “youth” in international law,[6] but the children’s rights movement is considered distinct from the youth rightsmovement. (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
Most Americans do not realize this, but Child Protective Services uses private contractors to kidnap children and steal them away from their homes. These private contractors are paid “reward money” that can add up to millions of dollars a year. Many of these children are then sold into sex slavery. Even Maryanne Godboldo has now openly accused CPS of being engaged in child trafficking as well as sexually molesting her daughter.
The jury of that court was somehow persuaded to believe that Maryanne’s refusal to continue drugging her daughter with a mind-altering psychiatric drug used to “treat” ADHD, equated to parental neglect. The multiple felony charges leveled against her are dismissed in a separate hearing.
Maryanne Godboldo, is the woman who was SWAT team raided when Child Protective Services attempted to kidnap her daughter because Maryanne refused to “treat” her with psychiatric medications Learn more>>>.
- Thats our Judge
- The Family Court System
- Tools ‹ Parents Rights Blog — WordPress
- True Story
- UK Secret Courts
- Unlawful Government Action
- United Kingdom Social Services
- WATCH FOR INNOCENT CHILDREN LOSING LOVING PARENTS
- WHAT REALLY GOES ON IN UK SECRET FAMILY COURTS
- World4Justice (Lobby Forum) Justice4Children
Pingback: WHERE IS JUSTICE? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Human Trafficking | Parents Rights Blog
“A new court policy leads to judicial oversight and better protection of parents’ rights. The change came just one day after the highly-publicized Maryanne Godboldo case in which a judge scofffed at the order used to remove her child.” http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/a-new-court-policy-leads-to-more-judicial-oversight-and-better-protection-of-parents%27-rights#ixzz1XJJPawJA
History of Human Rights http://wp.me/pXLdg-oP
Pingback: Domestic Violence News & Information | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Vulnerable child repeatedly raped by social worker while in Northamptonshire children’s home | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Victim Information and Notification Everyday | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Family justice: who are protecting our children? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Access to legal services | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Foster Mother Arrested for Murder of Toddler | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Government Sponsored Secret Family Courts | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Judges, Magistrates and Tribunal Judges | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Australian Constitution and Common Law Being Trampled On | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Charles McNally | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Voices Silenced By Fear | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Removed by people who have no respect for their identity or their Cultural background | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Goldie: Born to shine | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: A woman has been found guilty of murdering her toddler son | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Children’s rights | Northamptonshire County Council (UK) | Scoop.it
Pingback: Declaration of Rights Responsibilities | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Children’s rights | Public Law Children Act Cases | Scoop.it
Pingback: Maryanne Godboldo—Detroit Mother Who Refused to Drug Her Child | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Mother Faces Down Swat Team Tank For Promoting Children’s Rights | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The State And The Development Of Social Services | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: UK Human Rights Roundup | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Dred Scott v. Sandford | Parents Rights Blog