Behind The Secret Walls Of The Family Court System
via Law Commission And Misconduct in Public Office.
What should be happening is that the confused, mistaken or unclear public official should retire and not before their bad practices are brought to light within the public domain.
Sir James Munby stated: “We have real concerns, shared by other judges, about the recurrent inadequacy of the analysis and reasoning put forward in support of the case for adoption, both in the materials put before the court by local authorities and guardians and also in too many judgments. This is nothing new. But it is time to call a halt.”
Note the blame on local authorities and guardians, with a loose mention of ‘too many judgements’. I n plain English the issue is to do with the judges who do preside over care proceedings, indeed acting on behalf of local authorities, they are in the same gang. I may add people are waking up to the fact that the judges are entirely to blame for the mess our children are being placed in, behind the secret walls of the family court system.
Actual acts of child abuse or severe neglect are not the primary allegations used to seize children from their families, meaning deliberate acts, willfully committed with the intent to harm – contrary to public assumption. CPS employs a method known as the “Clinical Model“, in which the behaviors of the child are used to claim that there is some sort of obscure psychological abuse in the home that has traumatized the child. Continue reading
The All-Party Group – (APG) on Legal Aid
The APG on Legal Aid holds regular meetings at Parliament to discuss issues relating to legal aid. Meetings focus on specific topics, such as Government consultations, and generally follow the format of an address by an expert speaker or panel, followed by an open discussion of the topic. Speakers include representatives from Government, Parliament, the legal professions, clients, charities, advice agencies and many others. The APG’s terms of reference are as follows:
“To promote parliamentary and public understanding of the importance of the role of publicly funded legal services as a pillar of the welfare state and in reducing inequalities in society. To scrutinize and influence any proposals for the reform of Legal Aid provision to ensure that access to justice for all members of society is preserved and improved.” Continue reading
Useful Links.
- Absolute Immunity
- Child Protective Services – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Citizen Space – Court fees: proposals for reform
- Civil Procedure Rules, Practice Directions.
- Home page / Archives.
- Judge – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Season’s Greetings And Best Wishes For The New Year 2014.
- Scottish Parliament Says No To Gay Marriage Law Amendments.
- Lawful Disobedience: ARREST THAT JUDGE! Full Version HD (Uncensored) – YouTube
- The Constitution
- SUING THE POLICE
- Malicious Prosecution
- Word of the week: AUTHORITY
I believe that keeping silent when an injustice is taking place is condoning it.
Social workers taking the right care decisions, say Children’s Guardians. Really?
There is no such thing as immunity.
- BlackPanther.org
- NEWS ALERT: PARENT V NEW YORK WRONGLY DECIDED THREE YEARS AGO.
- Parental Responsibility.
- Report of Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer on CPS Corruption.
Case Studies:
- Florida, United States Of America.
- Northamptonshire, United Kingdom.
IN THE NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT His Honour Arthur Anthony JUDGE RUMBELOW QC A Circuit Court Judge Assigned to the Northern Circuit.
CASE NUMBER NN13P00882
Reblogged this on Ace News Desk 2014 and commented:
#AND2014
Reblogged this on pricekatie and commented:
mr david cameron well u think u going to get in nxt election i so dont think so u piece of crap
Pingback: David Cameron Has No Clue About Our ‘Care’ Industry | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: What Is Human Trafficking? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Application Under Hague Convention For Return Of A Child To A Third Country | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Child Trafficking Secrets | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Children-in-care lawsuit against Alberta government to be settled | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The Law Society Of Scotland Will Press Ahead With Plans To Admit Non-Solicitors As Members | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Who Is Really Against The Family? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The History Of The English Common Law Has Been The History Of Remedies – Part 1 | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Little Lost Children – Corporate Cannibal | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Latvian, Lithuanian And Russian Mothers In The United Kingdom | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: What Is Samantha’s Law? | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Barrister Of The Decade Courtenay Griffiths QC | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Former Judge Constance Briscoe | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Child Trafficking – Northampton Borough Council | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Judge Approves Settlement In Alberta Child Welfare Lawsuit | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Queen’s Bench Division | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Judges’ And Psychologists’ Assessments Of Legal And Clinical Factors In Competence For The Family Court | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The All-Party Group – (APG) on Legal Aid | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: The Law Is Ripe For Abusive Manipulative Authority Types | Parents Rights Blog
Pingback: Happy Anniversary with #WordPress | Toward Change